We’re excited to announce a series of significant updates to our research-focused “Future Work” items. If you would like to tackle one of these yourself, you can find out more by exploring them in the tool available on our website.
Thanks. Will that task require an RFC if the stereo rig will work with the unmodified Monty main branch?
I’ve got several questions about what TBP would want to see in that hardware demo, but I’m not sure where to post them. This thread doesn’t seem like the right place to be asking lower-level questions.
Great question, no, and in general that item doesn’t require an RFC because nothing would be merged into tbp.monty. As you suggest, it would still make sense to discuss any questions you have early on about the implementation approach. A new Topic along the lines of “Replicable real-world test bed: 3D printing + stereo rig” on here would be a perfect place to talk about this more.